@ElizabethJPetro
Thursday, January 24, 2019
word of the day: sidelight
Saturday, January 19, 2019
word of the day: bruit
to voice abroad; rumor (used chiefly in the passive and often followed by about)
(https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bruit?s=t)
"At the very least, the stories bruiting 'Oldest Life Form' were missing an essential point presented by Woese and Fox. A headline about 'Weirdest Life Form' might have captured that better."
- David Quammen, The Tangled Tree: A Radical New History of Life
Friday, January 18, 2019
word of the day: blepharitis
Inflammation of the eyelids. (https://www.dictionary.com/browse/blepharitis?s=t)
"The twisting motion of spirochetes, such as the ones that cause syphilis and Lyme disease, evidently allows them to wiggle through obstacles that other bacteria can't easily cross, such as human organ linings, mucous membranes, and the barrier between our circulatory system and our central nervous system - a fateful degree of access. Even the less dynamic shapes, the short rods known as bacilli, the spheres known as cocci, and the rods slightly curved like commas, serve well enough the bacteria responsible for a long list of diseases: anthrax, pneumonia, cholera, dysentery, hemoglobinuria, blepharitis, strep throat, scarlet fever, and acne, among others."
- David Quammen, The Tangled Tree: A Radical New History of Life
Thursday, January 17, 2019
word of the day: salubrious
favorable to or promoting health; healthful:
"It was also a salubrious reminder to humans of our inescapable linkage to other creatures, including some very humble ones. We are, at the most basic level of classification, eukaryotes. So are amoebae. So are yeasts. So are jellyfish, sea cucumbers, the little parasites that cause malaria, and rhododendrons."
- David Quammen, The Tangled Tree: A Radical New History of Life
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
word of the day: perspicacity
noun
"One of the bacteria he cultured and squashed was Clostridium perfringens, the microbe responsible for gas gangrene, an ugly form of necrosis that takes hold in muscle tissue made vulnerable by wounds, especially the sort that lay open among injured soldiers on battlefields. When he realized this, Luehrsen complained, but Woese 'just chuckled and said not to worry' in the absence of an open wound. He had been to medical school for 'two years and two days,' Woese said, and he could assure Luehrsen that Clostridium perfringens was unlikely to give him gangrene. Luehrsen took the episode as a lesson - not a lesson to trust Woese but to rely on his own perspicacity more - and never probed the matter of why Woese had quit medical school two days into his third-year rotation in pediatrics."
- David Quammen, The Tangled Tree: A Radical New History of Life
Thursday, February 01, 2018
Word of the day: cognate
The word of the day is cognate:
1. related by birth; of the same parentage, descent, etc.
2. Linguistics. descended from the same language or form.
3. allied or similar in nature or quality.
c.1645, from L. cognatus "of common descent," from com- "together" + gnatus, pp. of gnasci, older form of nasci "to be born" (see genus). Words that are cognates are cousins, not siblings.
(http://www.dictionary.com/browse/cognate)
"It was plain to see that these three religions all share historical antecedents with Nigerian Yoruba and Beninese Fon religions. They are clearly cognate religions."
- Henry Louis Gates, Jr., Black in Latin America
Thursday, January 11, 2018
Letter to the Baltimore Sun
The Baltimore Sun published a letter I wrote to them: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/readersrespond/bs-ed-rr-oprah-letter-20180110-story.html
Text reproduced here:
Dear Baltimore Sun,
Do you ever ask yourself what might have happened if, in the very early days of the 2016 presidential election, you hadn't breathlessly reported every movement and tweet of a celebrity whose only qualifications for running for national office were wealth and fame? Have you soberly reflected on dictionary.com’s word of the year for 2017, "complicit," and asked yourself to what extent you too are complicit in the current state of the world?
If you have, then, why, after everything we have all learned, did you choose to publish, "Oprah 2020: She can run, but will she?" (Jan. 9)? Before publishing this article, did you ask yourself to what extent does it report what actually happened (Oprah Winfrey gave a speech as she accepted an award at the Golden Globes), and to what extent does it fan the flames of wild speculation that a celebrity whose only qualifications are wealth and fame might run for national office?
Did you hope that reporting on Ms. Winfrey's presidential run would make the idea sound as plausible as "Icebreakers called out as cold weather persists" (also on page 6), and that two wrongs would somehow make a right?